A Companion to the Philosophy of Education by Randall Curren

By Randall Curren

A better half to the Philosophy of schooling is a finished advisor to philosophical pondering schooling. deals a state of the art account of present and debatable matters in schooling, together with concerns bearing on multiculturalism, distinct schooling, intercourse schooling, and educational freedom. Written by means of a world group of top specialists, who're without delay engaged with those profound and complicated academic difficulties. Serves as an imperative consultant to the sphere of philosophy of schooling.

Show description

Read or Download A Companion to the Philosophy of Education PDF

Similar educational philosophy books

Communities of Difference: Culture, Language, Technology

Groups of distinction seems on the implications of academic practices in groups which are differentiated through problems with language, tradition, and know-how. Trifonas and participants argue "community" is without delay a meeting of like-minded members in team spirit of goal and conviction, and in addition a meeting that excludes others.

Intercultural Competence in Education: Alternative Approaches for Different Times

This e-book explores the idea that of intercultural competence, focusing particularly on schooling. Intercultural competence can range looking on the sphere of study or the context of program and has as a result built over contemporary a long time. because the international turns into more and more worldwide intercultural competence has develop into much more very important however it remains to be now not practiced satisfactorily.

Extra info for A Companion to the Philosophy of Education

Sample text

C. REEVE In Aristotle, too, dialectic is the deepest of his Socratic and Platonic inheritances. But while the Socratic elenchus is every person's ticket to the ethically examined life and Platonic dialectic is the philosopher's ticket to scientific knowledge of ethics and politics, Aristotelian dialectic is in between: it is the generally educated, the liberally educated, citizen's ticket to reliable sources of expert scientific knowledge, and so to the liberating benefits of a socially and politically mediated division of epistemic labor.

Second, he will go through the difficulties he has uncovered to determine which can be solved and which cannot. As a result, he will be well placed to attack or defend either alternative in the strongest possible way. Aporematic, which is the part of philosophy that deals with such difficulties, is like dialectic in its methods, but differs from it in important respects. In a dialectical argument, for example, the opponent may refuse to accept a proposition that a philosopher would accept, since he can see too readily that he will be defeated if he does (Topics, 155bl0-16).

First, they give no argument for them, but take them simply as hypotheses (Republic, 510c-d). And, second, the accounts or definitions they provide for them are conceptually inadequate (527a-b). Yet if the first principles are false or defective, the entire system based on them is threatened. It is here that dialectic comes in. It renders these first principles "unhypothetical," not by deriving them from something yet more primitive (which is impossible), but by defending them against all objections (534b-c, 437a).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.17 of 5 – based on 24 votes